Running Back Manifesto

These are the facts as I know them:

1. Saquon Barkley is a phenomenally talented football player, with skills that may only be surpassed by his character and leadership.

2. Running back is not key to winning championships.

It is 2020 and we are into a new fantasy. I am not talking about Draft Kings or rotisserie. I’m talking about the resurrected belief that running the ball in the NFL is the script for winning. And if this gospel has a preacher, we can look no further than Dave Gettleman, the General Manager of the NY Giants. It is hard to believe, but the GM of this once noble franchise is still living in the 20th Century. He is an anachronism. He is a Neanderthal. The worst part is that he does not know what he does not know. He does not know that assigning greater value to Running Back in the NFL in 2020 is a destruction of value.

Before we dismantle this ‘Running Back is back’ myth, let’s begin with the quote from where it all began.

“But at the end of the day, it’s the three things you’ve had to do in 1935 that you got to do now in 2018. You got to run the ball. You got to stop the run. You got to pressure the passer.”

That was Gettleman’s quote from when he became GM of the Giants back in 2018. He chose Saquon Barkley at 1.02 overall and the rookie set the NFL afire. A funny thing happened along the way. The Giants finished 5-11 and then 4-12 the following year. Barkley is still only one player. While different from Barry Sanders in physique and style, both may end up sharing similar characteristics as electric Hall of Fame skill players without a ring… unless things change from the front office.

How can it possibly be argued that you can draft a player who can go to the Hall of Fame and it be the wrong decision? Success in the NFL is measured in championships. The Giants organization proudly displays its 4 Super Bowl titles. Winning is good. Winning seasons are better. Winning titles is best. Parcells taught us this. Either you are winning championships,  building for championships or you are failing. It does not take a rocket scientist blogger to point out that the Giants organization has been failing. Why?

Look no further than the 3 principles laid out by the new Giants GM.

RUNNING THE BALL AND STOPPING THE RUN ARE NOT 2 OF THE 3 KEYS TO WINNING IN THE NFL IN 2018 (or 2020).

This whole myth accelerated when the Neanderthal quoted another fraudulent statistic that sent the Twitter World ablaze.

“People say it’s a passing league, I get that. But you know that graphic on Sunday afternoon should not have been lost on anybody. The top four passing teams were not in the playoffs, the top four rushing teams were in the playoffs.”

Oh. My. God. It was a like a flea infestation. Anyone who loved Barkley, who loved ground and pound, who loved running, who hated analytics, “ran” with this stat.

Thankfully we got some saner heads to explain that this was a classic example of correlation, not causation. “Duh,” said Wonder, who in half a sentence dismantled the latest fantasy- “teams run more with the lead.”

JJ Zachariason did a great job of blowing up the myth about teams with the most rushing yards. Click through his Twitter thread. He compared the % ratio of Pass/Rush of winning teams in closer games (+/- 6 points) versus the % ratio in games where they were not. It clearly showed correlation but not causation.

I wouldn’t be blogging for the first time since the end of the season if I did not have more evidence on this myth about running. Thankfully, blissfully, I had another savior who came running to my aid. His name was Damien Williams. Damien Williams is the Unrestricted Free Agent Running Back who now owns a ring. Yes, 19 Running Backs were drafted back in 2014. None of them were Damien Williams. He was signed by the Dolphins as a UFA. The Dolphins let him go to Free Agency, and the Chiefs signed him. Those 19 draftees have compiled a grand total of 14 seasons as starters. Williams backed up LeSean McCoy, McCoy had injuries, Williams got more carries and the Chiefs got a title.

IT IS NOT RUNNING BACK. IT IS OFFENSIVE LINE.

Control the line of scrimmage. Protect the QB. Push the pile. Create holes for ordinary RBs. Is Williams as good as Saquon Barkley? Of course not. Williams can’t hold Barkley’s jock. Would Barkley be another enormous weapon for the Chiefs. Yes! But at WHAT COST? The Chiefs built their team with other players grabbing cap share. Mahomes was still on his rookie contract. The salary + roster bonus + proportional hit from Williams signing bonus was $1.7M this past season. This is on a veteran contract! Barkley is on a rookie contract and his cap hit (Salary in 2019) was $7.1M. That is a pretty stark comparison, that a veteran contract can be 24% of a rookie contract for the same position. That extra $5.4M dollars can be spent on other things. Each year. That is the world of a hard salary cap. You have to play that hard cap game and allocate resources to where the value is.

Speaking about spending, let’s look under the hood and see where NFL GMs spend their cap dollars. Here is a list of average annual salaries (source: Spotrac). The math is not perfect, as we take the total value of all contract at a position, divide by the number of players and the length of those contracts to get an average salary per year. Because we use the same methodology with every position, the results are precise, not accurate. Still, the table below is revealing…

    1. QB  $8.7M
    2. T     $4.0M
    3. C     $3.6M
    4. DE  $3.5M
    5. G    $3.5M
    6. DT  $3.3M
    7. WR $3.2M
    8. LB  $3.2M
    9. CB  $3.1M
    10. S    $2.6M
    11. TE $2.2M
    12. RB $2.0M

Yes, Running Back is dead last. Why? Because they are replaceable. Money talks. Running Back walks. Is Barkley worth more because his prototypical body gives him a chance at having a far longer career? Yes. But the spending patterns show that investing in RB is not critical to success in the NFL. Only 42% of plays are running plays. The NFL is a Passing league.

Another way to see success is to look at the list of Winning Super Bowl RBs.  It is a who’s not who.

41 Rhodes UFA
42 Jacobs R4
43 Parker UFA
44 Thomas UFA
45 Starks R6
46 Bradshaw R7
47 Rice R2
48 Lynch R1
49 Vereen R2
50 Anderson UFA
51 Blount R3 / White R4 /Lewis R5
52 Blount R3
53 Michel R1 rookie
54 Williams UFA

Assigning a R9 value to UFA means that the average Super Bowl Running Back over the past 14 years sported a Round 5.3 pedigree. The Brady Round 6 outlier at QB is the standard for Super Bowl Running Backs.

Someone please send this memo to Gettleman, because nearly everyone else has figured out that you do not need a superstar RB to win a title. Marshawn Lynch is the only “star” on this list, and he was traded by the Bills. Sony Michel was taken 1.32 at the very end of the first round and helped the Patriots as a rookie. So the evidence is very clear that RB is merely a cog in the engine. Allocate outsized salary resources at RB from your cap total at your expense. WORSE, allocate outsized DRAFT resources at RB from your draft capital at grave expense. Barkley became the 4th highest RB from the moment he was selected, burning the value of the cheap rookie contract, which pretty much exists for almost every position except RB and TE in Round 1.

Another thing that is striking about that list of Super Bowl champion running backs is that it is a turnstile. There is only one player on the entire list who shows up twice, LaGarrette Blount. And it is not because he is good. It is because he is good  value . In 2016 with the Patriots, he was signed for ~$1M and got $0.5M in incentives for a grand total of $1.5M. In 2017, with the Eagles, he took up $1.25M in cap space. So Blount did not cost the Patriots or Eagles much in cap allocation and he also cost them zero in Draft capital.

Career length/injuries is another issue. Tiki Barber pointed out that for a RB, each game in the NFL was the equivalent of going through a car crash. The toll it takes on bodies is very high. As a position, RBs have the second lowest career length.

So let’s summarize the low positional value of RB:

  • Only 42% of plays from scrimmage are running plays
  • RBs get hurt more than other positions
  • Their careers are shorter due to injury
  • RBs are replaceable
  • RBs have the lowest salary of all starting positions on Offense & Defense
  • The Super Bowl blueprint shows only 1 pedigree’d RB winning in the last 14 years
  • Teams that are running the ball more are doing so because they have the lead in games, not because they took the lead by running the ball

A steady change on rules/enforcement making passing easier has diminished the value of running the ball. We are not advocating abandoning the run altogether. There has to be some balance. Running backs also need to pass block and run pass routes. And yes, in the North/East, you do need to run the ball in inclement weather in December and January. Yet the Giants GM is fooled by a statistic saying that the teams with the best running games were in the playoffs while the 4 best passing Offenses were not. The answer is to build a strong Offensive Line, which leverages both pass and run while protecting the Franchise- its Quarterback.

I love Saquon Barkley. He is a class act and he can make a difference on the field. (Remember, he was the #1 rated prospect by Wonder on his 2018 Draft Board.) Barkley can catch passes out of the backfield, which is critical in today’s NFL. He is a luxury that Gettleman could not afford when given the task of rebuilding the franchise. The Giants did not have an Offensive Line in 2018. Now that Barkley is on the team you have to leverage him. From the moment he was picked, yes that evening, we pounded the table to draft OL. Since then, Gettleman has selected Hernandez in Round 2 (very good, although disappointed in his 2nd season) and R7 Asafo-Adjei (Injured Reserve, 0 games). That is CLEARLY NOT ENOUGH. It is 2020 and the Giants still do not have an Offensive Line. Trade down, draft OL in Round 1, and draft OL in a later round. Rebuild.

NY Giants: Post Mortem 2019

PART 1- Shurmur Out, Gettleman Remains

It is really one large cosmic joke that the Giants have not parted ways with Gettleman. The conventional wisdom (brainwashing) is that you want stability and that Gettleman needs more time. A friend, Dimitri Raitzin, counters this with correct perspective:

The problem is that Mara wants the Giants to be the Steelers, but Gettleman is no Kevin Colbert. Stability is nice when you’re competing for the playoffs every year. The Giants are annually competing for a Top 5 draft pick. That type of stability is worthless.

Therein lies the problem. John Mara is living in the past, thinking he is one fix away from getting back on track. We have noted how he needs to remove himself from this process completely, relinquishing control and stepping down as Chief Executive.

The Giants have Gettleman for at least 1 year but more likely at least 2 years, as he will now be attached to the next Head Coach’s fate. Gettleman can recognize talent in the Draft but he does not make good decisions. His Free Agency track record is awful. Gettleman chose Shurmur. He lacks fundamental understanding of what wins in the NFL in 2020. And he lacks understanding of how to make value-based decisions in a hard cap value world (as evidenced by him paying Barkley top 4 RB money on his rookie contract when the rookie contract is a key to extracting value in the post-2011 CBA order).

PART 2- Head Coach Search

Front and Center, the Giants now embark on a Head Coach search. It will be Gettleman who will conduct this search.  His due diligence on Shurmur was flawed. If one looks at Shurmur’s track record more carefully, we see that he was the Interim Head Coach in Philadelphia yet Philadelphia did not elevate him- why? We know why now, 2 years later. Note how 2 years ago the Giants wanted an “adult” post-McAdoo. Today the owners are singing a different tune, saying that they want a “leader.” Get the picture? Maybe Gettleman will get lucky this time. I prefer to make my own luck.

Mara and Tisch will sign off. Garbage in, garbage out. There are a few prominent names under consideration from this report collected by Jordan Raanan.

  1. Matt Rhule. This one can make a lot of sense. “Rhule is acceptable,” says Wonder, the Draft Analyst for UltimateNYG NY Giants Blog. “He will get them back on course. He does a good job of organizing and putting together his team. While I am not overwhelmed by him, I do like him. He is pretty solid. He is a much better selection than a retread like Ron Rivera.” And speaking of retreads, Wonder issued a very stern and sharp warning for those even mentioning the name of Jason Garrett. “If the Giants tap Garrett as the next Head Coach, all fans should just turn in their Giants card. Go on strike. Throw in the towel.” I had independently reached the same conclusion, having tweeted that Garrett does less with more, the classic sign of underachievement. I think any Giants fan paying attention to Dallas (they are, after all, in the NFC East) knows that Garrett does not make his team better.
  2. Josh McDaniels. I was a little concerned about what happened in Denver in McDaniel’s first stint as a Head Coach. It felt like major dysfunction, along with immaturity. After reading this, I would be hopeful that his next opportunity would fare much better. Wonder would be comfortable with McDaniels. Realistically speaking, I do not think it will happen, as there are rumors that Belichick told both Patricia and McDaniels not to take the Giants job 2 years ago. Wonder really likes McDaniels, and thinks he would be even better than Rhule: “I am not concerned about what happened in Denver. He may have a handshake agreement on getting the job in New England if/when Belichick steps down, so that is the reason why I am more doubtful about the likelihood of it happening here.”
  3. Eric Bieniemy. “I want no part of him,” says Wonder. “The only reason why he is being considered at all is because the KC Offense is stacked. Even I could coach that team with all the talent there,” jokes our analyst.

PART 3- Nepotism

I keep hearing about Chris Mara wanting the NY Giants GM job, be it two years ago when he was passed over, now or whenever. Is there anyone who has confidence in his abilities? There was open dysfunction between him and Jerry Reese. How do you fire your own brother?

PART 4- The Draft

The Giants have the 4th pick overall.

Mara: “The key is still the Draft, making good draft picks and you have to supplement that with Free Agency. You can’t think that you’re going to solve all of your problems in Free Agency… it just doesn’t work.”

The good thing is that I agree with EVERYTHING Mara just said there. The problem is that his GM that he supports does not understand the value of his Draft picks (or how to make good sensible FA decisions either, but let’s stay with the Draft….). No GM bringing up the rear at the trade deadline gives up Draft picks FOR the expiring contract. Gettleman blew the 70th pick overall plus a Round 4/Round 5 pick in 2021 for Leonard Williams. The key is the Draft. Mara just said it. The value is in the rookie contracts. The CBA says it. The Giants threw away critical currency for its rebuild. Gettleman did it.

Preliminary indications are that this Draft is deeper in OL. Ya think that that 70th pick overall can help throw help at that problem?? Look at the Patriots, who are competitive every year. They collect massive amounts of draft picks and let veteran players walk, in return for … compensatory Draft picks. So the answer is right in front of you. This is how to do business in the 21st Century. To be fair to Gettleman, he did move some players (like JPP, Apple and Harrison) and collected picks. Yet to go in reverse and go for Williams on the hope of signing him was not consistent with value. Williams was bait for a playoff contender who needed (injury) help with interior DL. Period. If we could somehow sign Williams to a much cheaper deal before FA, that was the only way this was paying off. That is highly unlikely.

Every part of your plan must be efficient. Bad decisions add up. You find value through a series of decisions where EVERY decision has value. Just because it has value does not mean it will work out. If I throw a coin and heads I win $2 while tails I lose $1, I want to throw that coin. I may lose with tails but that is ok. The Williams trade simply did not have value. That was not a good coin toss.

PART 5- Analytics

Why are analytics important? We talked about this at length literally a decade ago on this blog when we recommended Money Ball by Michael Lewis. My old posts are gone due to a couple of host site migrations over the years, but all you need to know is that Billy Beane figured out that by cranking the numbers you can figure out what works for assembling a winning team. It was all about VALUE. Beane was able to field competitive teams on salaries that were significantly less than his peers.

Beane got outspent because he did not have a hard cap. Imagine Beane in a hard cap sport and that is football analytics. To belittle/ignore their value is like passing on that favorable coin toss. Or worse… not quantifying what the coin toss looks like in the first place.

Imagine our amusement, when hearing this from Steve Politi…

“I’m still digesting John Mara’s press conference today, but when an owner … tells everyone that his team has a killer new analytics department that you just didn’t know about… that was weird, right?”

Maybe it is completely weird when Dave Gettleman, only a couple of years ago, waves his hands, pokes fun at the nerds and calls analytics “nonsense.”

So who are you going to believe? Did Gettleman all of a sudden wake up and figure out that he needs to change and get into the 21st Century? Positional VALUE? I’ll believe it when Politi asks Gettleman that question tomorrow and we see a 180 from the Giants GM. “People don’t change. They become more so,” said a wise sage. No, I am not expecting lightning bolts tomorrow.

PART 6- Scapegoating Shurmur

Jay Glazer called out the Giants for contradicting facts.

Did you expect anything less when they decided to keep Gettleman? We know Shurmur was a boob on mismanaging the players. We never chased after Gettleman when Shurmur under-leveraged Barkley’s skills. Similarly, we did not go after Shurmur when the Giants traded draft picks for Leonard Williams.

I thought the Reese bye week pressers were comedy. Today was a continuation of the denial. Mara on Gettleman’s Free Agency boners: “He does know that the batting average has to increase going forward.” Well, at least we got that. The last time we got a warning from Mara to his GM, Reese lost his job two years later. I sure hope Gettleman nails the Head Coach hire because we fans can’t take another 2 years of this.

Dave Gettleman

When Dave Gettleman was introduced to the media and fans as the new General Manager of the NY Giants, he said something that stuck with me then and still sticks with me to this day…

“But at the end of the day, it’s the three things you’ve had to do in 1935 that you got to do now in 2018. You got to run the ball. You got to stop the run. You got to pressure the passer.”

Really?

Two out of the three most important things you want to architect your franchise with are running the ball and stopping the run? This is Neanderthal thinking. Dave Gettleman is an anachronism. It is manifested in many ways, but the biggest one was his unequivocal decision to draft Saquon Barkley at 1.02 overall in the 2018 Draft. We did not like the pick from the moment he chose the Running Back, we still don’t like it, and we won’t like it even if Barkley goes to the Hall of Fame (which may happen if Barkley has a head coach with ‘intelligence’). Love the player. Hate the pick. Yes, we need to restate that Wonder had Barkley as the NUMBER ONE PROSPECT on his Draft Board that year. Yet it is not how you build a team in 2018.

For those of you who want to re-enter 2018 (and 2020, which is fast approaching), consider this article on analytics in Sports as we close out this decade.

“It doesn’t take a calculus degree to understand why quants have screamed for teams to pass the ball more. It was simple. As it turns out, passing consistently yields more yards.”

Roughly speaking, the game I grew up with the 1970’s ran the ball roughly 60% of the time and passed the ball 40% of the time. Today it is reversed. Why? Because the rules have changed. Offensive Linemen can hold inside the shoulder pads. Defensive players are not allowed to breathe on receivers after 5 yards. Rules for safety mean you can only hit the QB in about 3% of his body without being called for roughing the passer.

The NFL has an agenda. It wants the ball in the air. It wants its QBs to be protected from injury. It does not want receivers getting concussions on every passing route like the days of Wayne Chrebet.

Selecting Running Back at 2 Overall is folly, and we do not want to spend this blog post regurgitating all of the reasons why. Injuries, career length, platooning, absence of star running backs on nearly all of the past 10 Super Bowl winning teams, picking one without an Offensive Line to block for him (see our guest podcast from last week)… POSITIONAL VALUE for Running Back is a freaking joke.

We will mention one more reason which we have not mentioned previously, because it only goes further in exposing what insanity it is to take a guy like Barkley at 1.02. When Barkley was signed as a rookie at that spot, he instantly became the 4th highest paid Running Back in the NFL without even taking a snap. The 2011 Collective Bargaining Agreement between players and owners got rid of this excess by reducing rookie salaries as a proportion of the cap. Yet this happened .. why? Because Running Backs do not have the positional value anymore in the NFL to command huge salaries… because of all the reasons we cited above. Money talks and bullsh*t walks. Even the money says don’t pay it to running backs. Yet by taking a RB at #2 overall, Gettleman the fossil ignored the 21st Century and architected his team right out of the box with a 20th Century move. If he had selected a QB or traded down, he would not have had that problem. He would have figured out what everyone else in the NFL has figured out- that you select QB, an elite pass rusher (the one part out of 3 he actually did acknowledge correctly), or you trade down. (Yes, if there is an elite Left Tackle, you can go that route too, but there are risks there.)

Maximizing the cheapness of rookie contracts is critical to being competitive in an NFL hard cap world. The worst part is that Gettleman doesn’t know what he doesn’t know… we’re betting his hubris makes him oblivious to this dynamic. Confronted with the Brutal Fact that a 1.02 RB eliminates rookie cap value, he’ll just say that that doesn’t matter because I have Barkley. These things do matter because they all add up- the lack of an OL to leverage a RB’s production, the injuries, the wasted rookie cap advantage… we see it via an 8-22 record.

In the podcast, we discussed how critical it is to squeeze out production from cap dollars. Look at competing teams like the Saints and Vikings, who have Alvin Kamara and Dalvin Cook on much cheaper rookie deals allocated to this position. Cook makes $1.6M/yr, selected 41st overall. Barkley makes $7.8M/yr. That $6M extra every year for 4 years to use on OTHER POSITIONS is a huge competitive advantage. Yes, it’s harder to find talent in the draft in Round 2 than Round 1. But not that difficult. And because RB is avoided by GMs in Round 1, you can get impact RBs more easily in R2 or R3. This all goes back to positional value.

There are other moves that Gettleman has made which demonstrate his prioritization with stopping the run. We rated Dexter Lawrence high out of the Draft. He was #13 on our Board, and the Giants took him at 1.17. He helps the Defensive Interior. Why Gettleman also traded for Leonard Williams at the end of his contract for a ~3.66 and 2021’s Round 4 was over the top stop-the-run zeal. Now he must sign Williams to realize the value of picking up a player when the team was nearly a lock not to make the playoffs.

We will not go into all of the myriad mistakes Gettleman has made, such as Omameh, Stewart, not rebuilding in 2018, Shurmur et al. Just keep it simple and know that the Giants GM is not in step with the NFL. He believes that it is a foundation to run the ball and stop the run. It is not. Those days are long gone. It is not a coincidence that the Giants days as a winning organization are also in the past. It is time to reenter the present and get a GM who understands the truth of what it takes to win in the NFL.

Denial is a River

One of the blessings of this dreadful season for me personally is that I have given up the weekly game recaps. No longer do I have to chronicle the mishaps and regurgitate the misery of yet another season of dysfunction.

Sunday evening I read a quick story on the “anger” of John Mara. He was smart enough (ostrich) to leave the building without saying anything to the media. That is the problem with John Mara. He is just smart enough to think highly enough of his abilities, yet not smart enough to accept COMPLETE responsibility for the state of the franchise. Does he truly understand that he needs to hold himself accountable for everything? This blogger is fairly certain that Mara is in denial- it is his franchise and his decisions that have sent this franchise to this place. We will not see the kind of meaningful change that we noted here (almost a year ago to the day in November) until Mara reaches that point where he realizes his methods and his decisions have been the source of the persistent losing.

We know it is a rebuild. We have been using that word for quite some time. 2-8 should not bother me. The reason it does bother me (greatly) is that this team keeps making weak decisions and keeps underachieving on the field. It is okay to rebuild and admit you are rebuilding. It is not okay to have such poor coaching limit the development of the rookies you are trying to teach. Let’s discuss one glaring example.

The most significant problem in Sunday’s debacle to the Jets was not the loss. It was another pummeling of the heir to the franchise, Daniel Jones. He is a human pinata. People asked me if I was okay with Jones taking the reins when Eli faltered. YES, I said unequivocally! The reason why I was of such strong conviction was because he had a good enough Offensive Line not to become the next David Carr, so let’s get on with his matriculation. There is no time like the present in today’s post 2011-CBA, where winning with rookie contracts is a strategic edge. That is how you beat the salary cap. Getting Jones the experience today moves up his timetable and moves the franchise ahead. If you can lose with Manning, why not lose with Jones and get him the valuable experience he needs as soon as possible? That is the way the NFL works in 2019.

The crux to that argument is “David Carr.” David Carr was the rookie QB who was subjected to 76 sacks in his first year in the NFL. He never recovered. For lack of a better word, he became “hard-wired” to bad practices and failure. Let’s look at this list of leaders in sacks for rookie QBs. It is instructional in WHAT NOT TO DO. Do you see guys like Warren Moon and Jim Kelly up there? Pay no attention to them. Moon played for SIX YEARS in the CFL before coming to the NFL. He was no rookie. Kelly went to the USFL in 1983 and did not arrive in Buffalo until 1986. He was MVP of the USFL in 1984 and threw for 10,000 yards in that league before it folded. He was no rookie either. When you start at the top of the list and go down, it is littered with …. litter…. defunct players who never got on track. You can’t successfully develop a QB this way. But this is precisely what Shurmur is doing. Shurmur is so lost behind that playcalling sheet that he is on his way to potentially destroying the future of this franchise, Daniel Jones.

Let’s do some numbers. 76 sacks in 16 games was insane. Note how it was 20 sacks ahead of the #2 on the list. TWENTY SACKS. So David Carr was destroyed. His rate was 4.75 sacks per game. Average. Do you know the average number of sacks of Daniel Jones took the past 4 games? It is 5.5/game. If we use all 8 games he has started, it is still 4 sacks/game, a rate which would finish him at 56 sacks in a season with 2 games less than Carr. At the current spiraling rate of the past 4 games, Jones would be subjected to a total of 65 sacks. Shurmur is currently negligent in turning his rookie QB into a career-scarred pinata.

My memory of 2002 is not great, but I remember David Carr battling just like Jones is battling. That is what rookies do. They stand in the pocket longer because their bodies can take the abuse and they want to win at all costs. Those instincts are good, but only on the surface. Look at where it got Andrew Luck. Just because you “can” take a hit does not mean you want to be exposing yourself to unnecessary physical abuse. Not in a rebuild. Not in your first year. I like a QB who can hang in the pocket and take a hit. Yet I also hate a rookie who is subjecting himself to too much abuse. We already delineated why this is Shurmur’s responsibility a few weeks ago. The only difference now is that it just continues each week, week after week. No, not 8 per game. But 8 sacks, 3 sacks, 5 sacks, 6 sacks. It has gotten worse as the wheels have come off for Solder (concussion) and Remmers. When you lose whatever semblance of order you have on your Offensive Line, you need to adjust. But therein lies the problem with Pat Shurmur. He cannot see the forest for the trees because he is not managing his team. He is too busy managing playcalling. The team suffers. Daniel Jones suffers. The franchise suffers. And John Mara is angry.

Let’s discuss another example of losing the forest within the trees- Saquon Barkley. Every Giant fan could see Barkley was NOT Barkley on Sunday. He was running the ball without the cuts he is famed for, and his pass blocking was worse. Yet Shurmur had him in there and was calling his number over and over. If Barkley were making great moves and deserving of touches, that would be one thing, but this was not that day.

Quarter: Carries (yards)
Q1: 2, 3,
Q2: 0, -3, 3, 1, 2
… hello McFly …. McFly …
Q3: -2, 0, -1
… earth to Shurmur, earth to Shurmur ….
Q4: 0, -4

13 carries for 1 total yard. He was hurt. What is going on here?

Are we going to see adjustments in scheme? Does Jones get subjected to another 6 games of physical abuse? Or do we get a Head Coach who can see the forest for the trees?

Let’s go back to selecting an Outsider. Mara chose the septuagenarian insider Accorsi to select the sexagenarian insider Gettleman, who in turn selected Shurmur. The word was that Patricia and Daniels were preferred but skipped on the Giants. Why? I suspect it was because they understood what kind of franchise the Giants were. It is a franchise with too much loyalty and nepotism. Loyalty gets you Accorsi, Abrams, Gettleman and Ross in the mix for the GM position. Gettleman was a safe choice. Shurmur was a safe choice, a grown up with experience. No risk, no reward. These decisions are too safe and too familiar. I’d rather lose with a process which interviews 4 outsiders and finds one with the references that stand out. Mara is afraid of what that kind of change will do to his organization. Fans are tired of an organization that is too comfortable with losing. Shurmur is very good at losing, and Gettleman/Mara have to much hubris to face the music.